By Dariusz Jemielniak

With an emphasis on peer–produced content material and collaboration, Wikipedia exemplifies a departure from conventional administration and organizational versions. This iconic "project" has been variously characterised as a hive brain and a data revolution, attracting hundreds of thousands of recent clients while it's been denigrated as anarchic and tormented by incorrect information. Has Wikipedia's constitution and internal workings promoted its impressive progress and enduring public relevance?

In Common Knowledge?, Dariusz Jemielniak attracts on his educational services and years of energetic participation in the Wikipedia neighborhood to take readers contained in the website, illuminating the way it capabilities and deconstructing its specified association. opposed to a backdrop of misconceptions approximately its governance, authenticity, and accessibility, Jemielniak gives you the 1st ethnography of Wikipedia, revealing that it isn't totally on the mercy of the general public: as a substitute, it balances open entry and tool with a distinct paperwork that takes a web page from conventional organizational kinds. alongside the way in which, Jemielniak comprises attention-grabbing situations that spotlight the tug of battle one of the members as they forge forward during this pioneering environment.

Show description

Read or Download Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia PDF

Best encyclopedias books

The Evolution Wars: A Guide to the Debates

The Evolution Wars attracts on background, technological know-how, and philosophy to ascertain the improvement of evolutionary idea during the earlier and a part centuries. It specializes in the debates that experience engaged, divided, and eventually provoked scientists to give some thought to the origins of life--including humankind--paying regard to the nineteenth-century conflict over the character of class and debates concerning the fossil checklist, genetics, and human nature.

Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece

The traditional Greeks tested modes of and attitudes approximately war that profoundly encouraged later eu and European-based peoples. certainly, the triumph of Western civilization from Greco-Roman instances to the current owes an incalculable debt to the Greeks. In interesting aspect, this quantity covers Greek guns, armor, conflict formations and strategies, and naval war, supported through a variety of eyewitness debts of battles and different pivotal occasions.

Gale Encyclopedia of Science

Publication by means of

Additional info for Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia

Example text

The English Wikipedia is an exception, having as many as thirtyfive as of November 2013. In my experience, most bureaucratic tasks are simple and involve mostly granting requests for renaming or taking over accounts. The major problem that bureaucrat candidates face is the difficulty of making the case that a new bureaucrat is needed, because there are a sufficient number. As a result, the number of candidates has been gradually decreasing. On the English Wikipedia in 2005–2008, the number of candidates ranged from fourteen to twenty-three per year, but as few as 20 percent were elected to a bureaucrat position.

Some declare that they are not admins, although this sometimes indicates that they have gripes with the community. One of the most common userboxes is the Babel tower, with which editors declare their language skills on a scale from 0 (no ability to speak a given language) to 5 (professional-level fluency) or list a language with no number, indicating a native speaker. Babel-tower userboxes, like declarations of functions or rights held on a project, typically are used for most Wikimedia projects.

Newcomers are especially prone to violating the rule against conflict of interest (COI). In general, editors are advised to not work on articles about which they may not be neutral. They are particularly discouraged from writing their own biographies. Similarly, writing about something one has interest in is not recommended, and editors are advised to disclose any possible conflict of interest. Administrators are forbidden to use their administrative privileges when they are also involved as regular editors (for example, an admin cannot block a user with whom he or she has a dispute, unless this 2 0 W i k i p e d i a i n S h o r t dispute stems from the administrator trying to reason with a troublemaking user).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.44 of 5 – based on 19 votes