By Seyla Benhabib
The worldwide pattern towards democratization of the final 20 years has been followed by way of the resurgence of varied politics of "identity/difference." From nationalist and ethnic revivals within the international locations of east and significant Europe to the previous Soviet Union, to the politics of cultural separatism in Canada, and to social flow politics in liberal western-democracies, the negotiation of identity/difference has develop into a problem to democracies all over the place. This quantity brings jointly a bunch of unusual thinkers who rearticulate and reassess the principles of democratic idea and perform within the mild of the politics of identity/difference. partly One Jurgen Habermas, Sheldon S. Wolin, Jane Mansbridge, Seyla Benhabib, Joshua Cohen, and Iris Marion younger write on democratic thought. half Two--on equality, distinction, and public representation--contains essays through Anne Phillips, Will Kymlicka, Carol C. Gould, Jean L. Cohen, and Nancy Fraser; and half Three--on tradition, identification, and democracy--by Chantal Mouffe, Bonnie Honig, Fred Dallmayr, Joan B. Landes, and Carlos A. Forment. within the final part Richard Rorty, Robert A. Dahl, Amy Gutmann, and Benjamin R. Barber write on even if democracy wishes philosophical foundations.
Read Online or Download Democracy and Difference: Contesting Boundaries of the Political PDF
Similar democracy books
Legislative time period limits are crucial electoral reform at the political time table within the usa. time period Limits and Legislative illustration assessments the crucial arguments made by means of either supporters and rivals of the reform via analyzing the adventure of Costa Rica, the one long term democracy to impose time period limits on legislators, and through supplying wide comparisons with legislatures in Venezuela and the U.S..
Many nations have experimented with assorted electoral ideas so as both to extend involvement within the political approach or enable you to shape solid governments. Barry Ames explores this significant subject in a single of the world's such a lot populous and demanding democracies, Brazil. This e-book locates one of many assets of Brazil's "crisis of governance" within the nation's distinctive electoral process, a approach that produces a multiplicity of vulnerable events and individualistic, pork-oriented politicians with little responsibility to voters.
Whereas Alexis de Tocqueville defined the United States because the 'absolute democracy,' Karl Marx observed the kingdom as a 'defiled republic' as long as it approved the enslavement of blacks. during this insightful political heritage, Nimtz argues that Marx and his companion, Frederick Engels, had a much more acute and insightful examining of yankee democracy than Tocqueville simply because they well-known that the overthrow of slavery and the cessation of racial oppression have been important to its recognition.
This booklet appears at evolving tendencies in democracy at european and united kingdom degrees, mentioning the first shortcomings of either. It examines the connection among democratic practices of the ecu and the united kingdom, explaining the anomaly of how within which the ecu, regardless of the bad caliber of its personal democracy, has enabled devolved determination making in a singular multi-layer polity.
Additional resources for Democracy and Difference: Contesting Boundaries of the Political
According to the republican view, the citizens' political opinion- and willformation forms the medium through which society constitutes itself as a political whole. Society is, from the very start, political society-societas civilis. Hence democracy becomes equivalent to the political self-organization of society as a whole. This leads to a polemic understanding of politics directed against the state apparatus. In Hannah Arendt's political writings one can see where republican argumentation directs its salvos: in opposition to the privatism of a depoliticized population and in opposition to the acquisition oflegitimation through entrenched parties, the public sphere should be revitalized to the point where a regenerated citizenry can, in the forms of a decentralized self-governance, (once again) appropriate the power of pseudo-independent j0RGEN HABERMAS 27 state agencies.
V The democracy we are familiar with is constitutionalized democracy, democracy indistinguishable from its constitutional form. Its modem ideological justification can be found in Harrington, the English republicans, The Federalist, and Tocqueville. Each was a critic of democracy. Each records a reaction to revolution, although not a reactionary reaction. Each of their constitutions is constructed against democracy; while each seeks to repress democracy none seeks to suppress it. It is to be given a "place," as the American framers did in the House of Representatives, otherwise the legitimacy allegedly bestowed by "the sovereign people" would lack all credibility.
Peter Euben,John R. , Athenian Political Thought and the Reconstruction of American Democracy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994). 2. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. Michael Oakeshott (Oxford: Blackwell, 1946), 83. 3. Mary Douglas, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (Harmondswonh: Penguin, 1970), esp. 137££. 4. For a fuller discussion, see my "Democracy, Difference, and Re-Cognition," Political Theory 21 (1993): 464-83. 5. The concept oftechne will be treated at full length in John Wallachs fonhcoming The Platonic Political Art.