By Harry Eckstein
To comprehend what stipulations make democracies good or volatile, potent or useless, Professor Eckstein examines the steadiness and effectiveness of Norwegian democracy. He reveals them either to be excessive. He then examines a number of theories derived from the research of alternative democracies or from comparative reports of different democratic and nondemocratic societies. almost all current an insufficient clarification of the Norwegian case, as the political divisions in Norway are the sort frequently linked to instability and ineffectiveness of democratic rule. the writer explains, besides the fact that, profound experience of neighborhood exists regardless of the political cleavages.
Originally released in 1966.
The Princeton Legacy Library makes use of the most recent print-on-demand expertise to back make on hand formerly out-of-print books from the celebrated backlist of Princeton college Press. those paperback variations look after the unique texts of those vital books whereas proposing them in sturdy paperback variants. The objective of the Princeton Legacy Library is to drastically raise entry to the wealthy scholarly history present in the hundreds of thousands of books released via Princeton collage Press due to the fact that its founding in 1905.
Read Online or Download Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway PDF
Similar democracy books
Legislative time period limits are an important electoral reform at the political time table within the usa. time period Limits and Legislative illustration exams the significant arguments made by way of either supporters and competitors of the reform through studying the adventure of Costa Rica, the one long term democracy to impose time period limits on legislators, and via supplying large comparisons with legislatures in Venezuela and the USA.
Many nations have experimented with assorted electoral principles so as both to extend involvement within the political approach or assist you shape strong governments. Barry Ames explores this crucial subject in a single of the world's such a lot populous and significant democracies, Brazil. This booklet locates one of many assets of Brazil's "crisis of governance" within the nation's specified electoral method, a method that produces a multiplicity of susceptible events and individualistic, pork-oriented politicians with little responsibility to electorate.
Whereas Alexis de Tocqueville defined the USA because the 'absolute democracy,' Karl Marx observed the kingdom as a 'defiled republic' as long as it accepted the enslavement of blacks. during this insightful political heritage, Nimtz argues that Marx and his associate, Frederick Engels, had a much more acute and insightful interpreting of yank democracy than Tocqueville simply because they well-known that the overthrow of slavery and the cessation of racial oppression have been relevant to its cognizance.
This booklet seems to be at evolving tendencies in democracy at ecu and united kingdom degrees, mentioning the first shortcomings of either. It examines the connection among democratic practices of the european and the united kingdom, explaining the ambiguity of how within which the european, regardless of the negative caliber of its personal democracy, has enabled devolved determination making in a unique multi-layer polity.
Additional resources for Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway
38Halvdan Koht and Sigmund Skard, The Voice of Norway (New York, 1944), pp. 1, 11-12. 28 Norway as a Stable Democracy never restored. , gentle manly) status, and the term "bureaucratic aristocracy" actually occurs in Norwegian writings;39 indeed, even today families as sociated with a history of officialdom often claim special respect. A functional elite, however, can hardly be a full equivalent of Britain's awesome aristocracy, and the respect officials often claim in Norway is in fact, to their chagrin, not often granted.
37 The absence of political litigiousness in Norway does not mean, however, that legal processes do not play a large role in resolving social conflicts. The principal student of Norway's legal profession, Vilhelm Aubert, has pointed out that lawyers, even if not the courts, have long played the central role in Norwegian conflict resolution, chiefly by in formal mediatory processes. Aubert, "Norske jurister: En yrkesgruppe gjennom 150ar," Tidsskrift for rettsvitenskap, LXXVII (1964), 310. 38Halvdan Koht and Sigmund Skard, The Voice of Norway (New York, 1944), pp.
ESeip, Fra embedsmannsstat til ettpartistat og andre essays (Oslo, 1964). 14 Norway as a Stable Democracy organization of a modern party system, very much in the British manner and at virtually the same time. The special position of the executive was broken in 1884, when parliamen tary government in the strict sense (selection of the executive from, and its full dependence on, the Storting) was established —again a remarkable similarity to Britain. 7 Norwegian democracy thus at least satisfies the criterion of durability that Dahl uses in his famous study of New Haven.