By Raphael Lataster

For a lay viewers, and with support from historian Richard service, non secular reviews student Raphael Lataster considers the easiest arguments for and opposed to the lifestyles of the so-called ancient Jesus; the Jesus of atheists.

Parts 1 & 2 examine the circumstances made through Bart Ehrman and Maurice Casey, who assert that Jesus certainly existed. Their arguments are discovered to be riddled with mistakes, and depending on unreliable, or even non-existing, assets. elements three & four speak about the extra sceptical paintings of Lataster and provider, who finish that Christianity most likely all started no longer with a humble wood worker, yet with 'visions' of a heavenly Messiah.

This interesting collaboration makes it very transparent why the historic Jesus will possibly not have existed in any case, and, to these keen to undertake a commonsensical probabilistic technique, Jesus didn't Exist.

About the Author
Raphael Lataster is a professionally secular PhD researcher on the collage of Sydney (Studies in faith) and teaches on faith at quite a few associations. His major learn pursuits comprise Philosophy of faith, Christian origins, common sense, Bayesian reasoning, sustainability, and substitute god-concepts equivalent to pantheism and pandeism. he's additionally an avid rock climber, and is an formally ordained Dudeist priest. Raphael wrote his Master’s thesis on Jesus ahistoricity theories, concluding that old and Bayesian reasoning justifies a sceptical angle in the direction of the ‘Historical Jesus’. For his doctoral paintings, Raphael is analysing the main philosophical arguments for God’s life (as argued via William Lane Craig, Richard Swinburne and Thomas Aquinas), makes an attempt to illustrate the logical improbability of theism, explores the theological traits of Philosophy of faith, and considers the plausibility of pantheistic worldviews. Being enthusiastic about schooling, Raphael hopes to proceed educating in non secular experiences and Philosophy, and makes each attempt to interact with the general public, via well known books, talking engagements, and public debates.

Show description

Read Online or Download Jesus Did Not Exist: A Debate Among Atheists PDF

Similar church history books

Shepherding Movement (Journal of Pentecostal Theology Supplement)

A fascinating background of the Shepherding circulation, an influential and arguable expression of the charismatic renewal within the Seventies and Eighties. This neopentecostal circulate, led through renowned Bible academics Ern Baxter, Don Basham, Bob Mumford, Derek Prince a

The New Testament and the Apostolic Fathers: 2-Volume Set

The two-volume paintings the hot testomony and the Apostolic Fathers bargains a comparative research of 2 collections of early Christian texts: the hot testomony; and the texts, from instantly after the recent testomony interval, that are conventionally known as the Apostolic Fathers. the 1st quantity, The Reception of the hot testomony within the Apostolic Fathers, provides a accomplished and rigorous dialogue of the level to which the writings later integrated within the New testomony have been recognized to and utilized by all of the Apostolic Fathers.

Jesus, Gnosis and Dogma

In Jesus, Gnosis and Dogma Roukema investigates and assesses some of the perspectives of Jesus in early Christianity, basing his method on a contrast among old and theological statements approximately Jesus. historic statements will be arrived at via a serious research of the earliest files, even if Roukema acknowledges that students vary greatly right here.

The Making and Unmaking of a Saint. Hagiography and Memory in the Cult of Gerald of Aurillac

A crusader, a hermit, a bishop, a deadly disease sufferer, or even a repentant assassin through turns: the tales hooked up to Saint Gerald of Aurillac provide an odd and fragmented legacy. His earliest biographies, written within the early 10th and early 11th centuries, depicted the saint as a warrior who dedicated his lifestyles to pious carrier.

Additional resources for Jesus Did Not Exist: A Debate Among Atheists

Sample text

We can quickly dismiss the existence of the Biblical Jesus and the Celestial Jesus and focus our attentions on whether the Historical Jesus existed. And that is precisely what we aim to do in this book. A related reason is that, as atheists, we should perceive the strongest case for Jesus’ historicity as coming from atheists. Christians will no doubt refer to implausible claims and sources we know to be far from reliable. Atheist scholars, however, take on a simpler challenge. It seems reasonable then, that the Jesus they come up with is a far more defensible Jesus, one unburdened by the most implausible of claims, particularly when coming under scrutiny by fellow atheists like myself.

I’d like to throw one more term into the mix. Not all ‘atheists’ are ‘strong atheists’. Some are simply ‘agnostics’. I would like to propose, then, that we use the term ‘ahistoricists’ to encompass both the ardent ‘mythicists’ and the less certain ‘agnostics’. This avoids the false dichotomy, which I think historicists (much like theists) have been taking advantage of. They act as if you are either a reasonable historicist, or one of those crazy mythicists. With my proposed terminology, it shall become much more transparent that there are many more scholars that question Jesus’ historicity than is typically thought; that this is not such a crazy idea.

33] Also, while it is true that I have not formally undertaken undergraduate units or subjects on Biblical history or the Biblical languages, I have through my postgraduate work (including professional supervision and self-guided training in the relevant areas) specialised in the New Testament, and early Christianity, published on these topics through peer-reviewed academic journals, and even taught on them at some of the world’s most prestigious institutions and universities. Furthermore, I am proficient in what is arguably the most important language of all: logic.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.50 of 5 – based on 11 votes