By Carl Boggs
In a robust new e-book, Boggs lines the old evolution of yank politics by means of concentrating on the sluggish triumph of company and armed forces strength over democratic associations and practices. the results of increasing usa international presence in view that international battle II--involving an built-in and interwoven approach of strength dependent within the everlasting struggle financial system, nationwide security-state, and company interests--has intended erosion of democratic politics, strengthening of the imperial presidency, elevated company and army impact over elections and laws, weakening of well known governance, and diminution of citizenship. The occasions of 9-11 and their aftermath, together with the struggle on Terror, long wars and international occupations, new threats of struggle, and large raises in Pentagon spending, have basically deepened the fashion towards ever-more centred different types of energy in a society that ostensibly embraces democratic values. Such advancements, Boggs argues, have deep origins in American historical past going again to the founding records, ideological precepts of the structure, early oligarchic rule, slavery, the Indian wars, and westward colonial growth.
Read or Download Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America PDF
Similar democracy books
Term Limits and Legislative Representation
Legislative time period limits are an important electoral reform at the political schedule within the usa. time period Limits and Legislative illustration checks the important arguments made through either supporters and competitors of the reform by means of reading the adventure of Costa Rica, the single long term democracy to impose time period limits on legislators, and by way of supplying vast comparisons with legislatures in Venezuela and the U.S..
The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil
Many nations have experimented with various electoral ideas so as both to extend involvement within the political approach or assist you shape good governments. Barry Ames explores this crucial subject in a single of the world's such a lot populous and significant democracies, Brazil. This e-book locates one of many assets of Brazil's "crisis of governance" within the nation's special electoral method, a method that produces a multiplicity of susceptible events and individualistic, pork-oriented politicians with little responsibility to voters.
Marx, Tocqueville, and race in America : the "absolute democracy" or "defiled republic"
Whereas Alexis de Tocqueville defined the USA because the 'absolute democracy,' Karl Marx observed the state as a 'defiled republic' as long as it authorised the enslavement of blacks. during this insightful political heritage, Nimtz argues that Marx and his companion, Frederick Engels, had a much more acute and insightful studying of yankee democracy than Tocqueville simply because they famous that the overthrow of slavery and the cessation of racial oppression have been relevant to its consciousness.
The European Union and British Democracy: Towards Convergence
This publication appears to be like at evolving developments in democracy at ecu and united kingdom degrees, mentioning the first shortcomings of either. It examines the connection among democratic practices of the european and the united kingdom, explaining the ambiguity of ways during which the ecu, regardless of the terrible caliber of its personal democracy, has enabled devolved selection making in a singular multi-layer polity.
Additional info for Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America
Sample text
30 This legacy has, from time to time, indeed presented a challenge to oligarchical power, a counterforce often working outside the established institutional matrix. Whether demotic moments can morph into transformative politics across time, or convert local energies into more durable struggles for change, would be yet another matter. The problem is that demotic moments are often episodic, immediate, restive, and lacking in durability. Many have been crushed by coercive state or military power.
Men of great wealth and property, most of whom owned slaves, wanted a strong federal government, and thought suffrage should be limited to white-male property owners in order to contain popular impulses. Their most urgent desire was to protect their accumulated wealth and power after independence from Britain was secured by the Revolutionary War. 2 With few exceptions, the colonial settlers looked to centralized power as a means of keeping order, destroying Indian resistance, maintaining slavery, conducting warfare, and (later) facilitating conquest of the Western frontier.
As the United States signed numerous treaties with those few remaining Indians that had been forced into reservations, it routinely and unilaterally broke such agreements, especially where the land was found to contain important natural resources. ”12 Contrary to any imaginable democratic ethic, native peoples were denied humanity and thus any genuine claim to political rights, much less citizenship, even as the governing circles continued to celebrate liberal principles. Federal negotiators signed treaties as essentially a tactical ploy, to be violated or broken at the slightest whim, as in the case of Cherokees and Crees whose villages were demolished in the wake of Jackson’s Removal Act.
